A Study of French Language Teaching in Iran in Light of Chaos/Complexity Theory

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Elham Sadat Mousavi
• Mahmoud Reza Gashmardi

Department of French Language Education, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jlts.2021.61244.0

Abstract

Interdisciplinary research is becoming increasingly important in academia. Language teaching has also an interdisciplinary nature, and modern theories can be applied for better development of language teaching. The present descriptive study has been conducted on the application of chaos theory to French language teaching in Iran. Two research questions motived this study, namely, how teaching French language can be defined in light of chaos/complexity theory and how chaos/complexity theory can constructively contribute to the development of French language teaching in Iran. First, the principles of chaos/complexity theory were nailed down and their application in language teaching was examined. To investigate to what extent the theory can be applied to foreign language teaching in Iran, fifteen French language classes in language institutes located in Tehran were observed. The results showed that recent approaches of language teaching cover some principles of the chaos/complexity theory, including complexity, dynamics and nonlinear approach in French language classrooms. However, the Iranian system of French language class remains a closed and predictable system that has a negative impact on class performance. Additionally, to properly apply this theory to the language classroom, measures should be taken to raise awareness of education systems and educators of dynamics, flexibility, and sensitivity of the language classroom.

Keywords

• Chaos/Complexity Theory
• French Teaching
• Iranian Learner
• Effective Teaching

20.1001.1.22285202.1401.55.1.3.7

References

آهنچیان، م. ر.، و محمدی چابکی، ر. (۱۳۹۲). آموزه‌های نظریّۀ آشوب در نظام آموزش و برنامۀ درسی علوم تجربی در ایران. فصلنامۀ مطالعات برنامۀ درسی، ۸(۲۹)، ۲۶-۵.

باقری، م. ب.، بیرجندی، پ.، و مفتون، پ. (1396). جایگاه تفکر نقادانه در نظام آموزشی ایران. پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناختی در زبان­های ﺧﺎرﺟﻲ، ۷(2)، 299-۳۲۳.

بهرامی، ن.، و بارع نیا، ه. (1390). زبان فرانسه در ایران (پیشینۀ و موقعیت کنونی). رشد آموزش زبان، ۲۶(1)، 27-۳۲.

خیرآبادی، ر.، و علوی مقدم، ب. (1398). فرض­ها و چالش­های فراروی آموزش زبان انگلیسی در نظام آموزش رسمی ایران. پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناختی در زبان­های ﺧﺎرﺟﻲ، ۹(1)، 53-۷۰.

گشمردی، م. ر. (1396). آموزش زبان با رویکرد شناختی: اهمّیّت علوم اعصاب شناختی در آموزش زبان خارجی. جستارهای زبانی، ۸(4)، ۱-۳۱.

 

Alhadeff‐Jones, M. (2008). Three generations of complexity theories: Nuances and ambiguities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 4(1). 66-82.

Ashby, W. R. (1963) Induction, prediction and decision-making in cybernetic systems. In H. E. Kyburg & E. Nagel (Eds.), Induction: Some current issues (pp. 55-56). Middletown, NJ: Wesleyan University Press.

Brunet, R. (1990). Définition du chaos [Definition of chaos]. L'Espace Géographique, 19(4), 315-315.

Clauzard, P. (2008). Processus Enseigner Différencier didactique et pédagogie [Teaching process differentiating between didactic and pedagogical]. Retrieved from: http:// www. formations. philippeclauzard. com

Conseil de l’Europe. (2001). Cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues: Aapprendre, enseigner, évaluer [Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment]. Paris, France: Didier.

Cutright, W. M. (1999). A chaos-theory metaphor for strategic planning in higher education: An exploratory study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.

Dauphiné, A. (1990). De l'ordre au chaos: Nouvelles démarches en géographie [From order to chaos: New approaches in geography]. L’Espace Géographique, 19-20(4), 289-301.

Dewaele, J. M. (2001). L’apport de la théorie du chaos et de la complexité à la linguistique [The contribution of chaos and complexity theory to linguistics]. La Chouette, 32, 76-86.

Dewaele, J. M., & Wourm, N. (2002). L'acquisition de la compétence socio pragmatique en langue étrangère [The acquisition of socio-pragmatic competence in a foreign language]. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 7 (2), 139-153.

Gashmardi, M. R., & Salimikouchi, E. (2011). Parcours de la francophonie en Iran: une francophonie latente [The route of the Francophonie in Iran: A latent Francophonie]. Alternative Francophone, 1(4), 99-112.

George, H. V. (1972). Common errors in language learning: Insights from English.  New York, NY: Newbury House.

Gleick, J. (1989). La théorie du chaos: Vers une nouvelle science [Chaos theory: Towards a new science]. Paris, France: Flammarion.

Hadidi Tamjid, N. (2007). Chaos/complexity theory in second language acquisition. Novitas-Royal, 1(1), 10-17.

Harshbarger, B. (2007). Chaos, complexity and language learning. Language Research Bulletin, 22, 17-31.

Kozden M. (2005). A framework for teaching a foreign language class based on the principles of chaos/complexity theory. (Unpublished master’s thesis), School for International Training, Brattleboro, VT. 

Landry, M., & Banville, C. (2000). Caractéristiques et balises d’évaluation de la recherche systémique [Systemic research characteristics and benchmarks]. Revue tunisienne des Sciences de Gestion, 2(1), 1-27.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141-165.

Le Moigne, J. L. (1996). Complexité [Complexity]. In D. Lecourt (Ed.). Dictionnaire d'Histoire et philosophie des sciences [Dictionary of history and philosophy of science] (pp. 205-215). Paris, France: Quadrige Dicos Poche.

Lorenz, E. (2000). The butterfly effect. World Scientific Series on Nonlinear Science, 39, 91-94.

Morin, E. (2004). L’éthique de la complexité et le problème des valeurs au XXIe siècle [The ethics of complexity and the problem of values in the twenty-first century]. In Où vont les valeurs? Entretiens du XXIe siècle [Where are the values going? 21st Century Talks] (pp. 43-46). Parsi, France: UNESCO.  

Reigeluth, C. M. (2004, March). Chaos theory and the sciences of complexity: Foundations for transforming education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

Robert, J. P. (2008). Dictionnaire pratique de didactique du FLE [Practical dictionary of teaching French as a foreign language]. Parsi, France: Éditions Ophrys.

Schuster, H. G., & Just, W. (2006). Deterministic chaos: An introduction. New York, NY: Wiley.

Shannon, C. E. (1949). Communication theory of secrecy systems. Bell System Technical Journal, 28(4), 656-715.

Von Bertalanffy, L (2012). Théorie générale des systèmes [General theory of systems]. Paris, France: Dunod.

Weaver, W. (1991). Science and complexity. In G. J. Klir (Ed.), Facets of systems science (pp. 449-456). New York, NY: Springer.

Wiener, N. (2019). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in animal and the machine. MIT Press, Massachusetts, MA.

Zeeman, C. (1978). Catastrophe theory. In W. Güttinger & H. Eikemeier (Eds.), Structural stability in physics (pp. 12-22). New York, NY: Springer