The Metamodernist Juxtapositions in Don DeLillo's Zero K

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Zohreh Ramin ¹
• Nasrin Nezamdoost ²

¹ Department of English Language and Literature, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

² Department of English Language and Literature, University of Tehran, Alborz Campus, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/lts.v52i2.79451

Abstract

Don DeLillo's recent novel, Zero K (2016), simultaneously has both modernist and postmodernist characteristics. Therefore, it cannot be considered a completely modernist novel or a very postmodernist one. Due to such outstanding juxtapositions, the present study suggests that Zero K is a metamodernist novel. As Metamodernism is an oscillation between modernism and postmodernism, this article aims to utilize Timotheus Vermeulen and Robin Van den Akker's theories on Metamodernism and analyze the metamodern juxtapositions in this novel. In order to apply their theories on the text of this novel, some oppositional modern and postmodern characteristics are chosen to be analyzed. Besides, the point of oscillation between the two poles of modernism and postmodernism is surveyed. Generally, the philosophy of modernism is based on optimism and utopianism. However, the philosophy of postmodernism is entirely focused on skepticism and pessimism. Modernists believe in utopia but postmodernist believe in dystopia. Some of the characters in this novel embody modernism and some of them embody postmodernism. There are moments that they simultaneously become the embodiment of these oppositional states. Furthermore, the language of modernist works is not ironical but the language of postmodernist works is ironical and there is no sign of sincerity in their speeches. Besides, quotidian and routine moments of life are the focus of attention in modernist works but such moments aren’t much valuable in postmodernist works. Such oppositional characteristics exist between modernist and postmodernist in Zero K. The results of this study show that the metamodern juxtapositions are illuminated in this novel through skeptical and optimistic views toward science and technology, sincerity and irony, engagement in and indifference to present moments, and utopia and dystopia. As Zero K oscillates like a swinging pendulum between the above-mentioned juxtapositions, and depicts the both-neither dynamic, it can be labeled as a metamodernist novel.

Keywords

• Metamodernism
• DeLillo
• Zero K
• Vermeulen and Akker
• Oscillation

20.1001.1.22285202.1398.52.2.7.2

References

دلیلو، د. (1396). کیْ صفر. ترجمة سهیل سمّی. تهران: چترنگ.

سبزیان، س.، و کزازیان. م. (1388). فرهنگ نظریه و نقد ادبی: واژگان و حوزه‌های وابسته. تهران: مروارید.

 

Akker, R. V., Gibbons, A., & Vermeulen, T. (2017). Metamodernism: Historicity, affect and depth after postmodernism. London, England: Rowman & Little-field International Ltd.

Barrett, L. (2018). Radiance in dailiness: Uncanny ordinary in Don DeLillo's Zero k. Journal of Modern Literature, 42(1), 106-123.

Berman, A. (1994). Preface to modernism. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

Boxall, P. (2015). The value of the novel. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Cofer, E. (2018). Owning the end of the world: Zero K and DeLillo's post-postmodern mutation. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 59(4), 459-470. doi: 10.1080/00111619.2017.1412936

DeLillo. D. (2016). Zero K. New York, NY: Scribner.

Derrida, J. (1993). Specters of Marx (P. Kamuf, Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Dini, R. (2016). Don DeLillo, Zero K. European Journal of American Studies, 2(1), 1-4.

Forlines, F. L. (2001). The quest for truth: Answering life's inescapable questions. Nashville, Tennessee: Randall House.

Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history. The National Interest, 16(1), 3-18.

Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York, NY: Free Press.

Fukuyama, F. (2012). The future of history. Foreign Affairs, 91(1), 53-61.

Gordin, M. D., Tilley, H., & Prakash, G. (2011). Utopia/ dystopia: Conditions of historical possibility. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Hassan, I. H. (1987). The postmodern turn: Essays in postmodern theory and culture. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.

Hutcheon, L. (2007). Gone forever, but here to stay: The legacy of the postmodern. In P. Goulimari (Ed.), Postmodernism what moment (pp.16-18). Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.

Hutcheon, L. (2002). The politics of postmodernism. New York, NY: Routledge.

McDonough, W. and Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Nel, P. (2008). DeLillo and modernism. In J. N. Duvall (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Don DeLillo (pp. 13-26). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Olson, L. (2009). Modernism and the ordinary. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Rudrum D. and Stavris, N. (Eds.) (2017). Supplanting the postmodern: An anthology of writings on the arts and culture of the early 21st century. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.

Sim, S. (2012). The Routledge companion to postmodernism. (3rd ed). London, England: Routledge.

Toth, J. (2010). Passing of postmodernism: A spectroanalysis of the contemporary. New York, NY: State University.

Vermeulen, T., & Akker R. V. D. (2010). Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 2 (1), 1-14.

Yang, C. (2009). Belief-based energy technology development in the United States: A comparative study of nuclear power and synthetic fuel policies. New York, NY: Cambria Press.

Zavarzadeh, M. (1975). The apocalyptic fact and the eclipse of recent American prose narratives. Journal of American Studies, 9(1), 69-83.

Vermeulen, T. (2012, February 12). Timotheus Vermeulen on metamodernism. (C. Potter, Interviewer) TANK Magazine, 12 (55). Retrieved from https:// tank magazine. com/ issue-55/ talk/timotheus-vermeulen

Ambrason, S. (2015, April 27). Ten basic principles of metamodernism. Retrieved from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ten-key-principles-in-met_b_7143202

Tulathimutte, T. (2016, April 27). Back to the future. Retrieved from https:// newrepublic.com/article/133004/don-delillo-back-future