Subjugation and Power of Female Body in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Samira Haghi
• Mahmoud Reza Ghorban Sabbagh
• Zohreh Taebi Noghondari

Department of English, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/lts.v51i3.68951

Abstract

Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale (1985) explores the notion of femininity in the context of a dystopian society of Gilead. In this totalitarian society, women are defined by reproduction ability of their bodies. Exploitation, objectification and alienation of the handmaid’s body can be explored in both the text and the context within which the novel has been written. In this novel, the negative and instrumental view towards female body can be explored in the light of biological and social contexts. The underlying assumption of these discourses is that female body can be manipulated and appropriated by patriarchal ideology in the name of religion and social reform. Tracing views on body in history, religion, society, and the novel itself, this paper attempts to explore how female body is represented and perceived. The following study focuses on the ways biological and social views try to define female body with certain functions and consequently identify women based on deterministic gendered ideologies. It also discusses the body’s potential to act as an empowering force to oppose different manifestations of power.

Keywords

• The Handmaid’s Tale
• Body
• Social Context
• Power Relations
• Dystopia

20.1001.1.22285202.1397.51.3.4.4

References

اَتوود، م. (۱۳۸۲). سرگذشت ندیمه. ترجمة سهیل سُمی. تهران، ایران: ققنوس.

 

Beauvoir, S. D. (2010). The second sex (C. Borde & S. Malovany-Chevallier, Trans.). New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.

Cixous, H., Cohen, K., & Cohen, P. (1976). The laugh of the Medusa. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(4), 875-893.

Cooper, P. (1995). Sexual surveillance and medical authority in two versions of the handmaid's tale. The Journal of Popular Culture, 28(4), 49-66.

Falwell, J. (1980). Listen, America! New York, NY: Doubleday.

Featherstone, M., Hepworth, M., & Turner, B. S. (1991). The body: Social process and cultural theory. London, England: Sage.

Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (pp. 78-108), (C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795.

Jeffries, L. (2007). Textual construction of the female body: A critical discourse approach. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kaler, A. K. (1989). A sister, dipped in blood: Satiric inversion of the formation techniques of women religious in Margaret Atwood's novel the handmaid's tale. Christianity & Literature, 38(2), 43-62.

Mills, S. (1995). Feminist stylistics. London, England: Routledge.

Raschke, D. (1995). Margaret Atwood's the handmaid's tale: False borders and subtle subversions. Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory, 6(3-4), 257-268.

Ruether, R. R. (1982). Feminism and patriarchal religion: Principles of ideological critique of the Bible. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Sheffield, 22, 54-66.

Sceats, S. (2003). Sharp appetites: Margaret Atwood’s consuming politics. In S. Sceats (Ed.), Food, consumption and the body in contemporary women’s fiction (pp. 94-124). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Somacarrera, P. (2006). Power politics: Power and identity. In C. A. Howells (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Margaret Atwood (pp. 43-57). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Turner, B. S. (2008). The body and society: Explorations in social theory. London, England: Sage.

Van Wichelen, S. (2012). The body and the veil. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of body studies (pp. 206-216). London, England: Routledge.