Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of English, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Until now, a large number of researchers have pointed to the structural complexity of The Waste Land by T.S. Eliot as it is shown in the relationship of the personages. In this paper, the sayings and the behaviors of five couples among many other personages of this poem are studied based on Eric Berne's theory of Transactional Analysis. For this purpose, the Structural Pathology of the couples is examined to identify the roots to their unsolved problems through which one can clearly understand the present condition of their relationships. The results of the present research indicates that two cases of Child Contamination, two persons with Parent Contamination, and one individual with Excluding Adult are observed in total out of five sub-categories of Structural Pathology. Therefore, the presence of the Adult Ego State, which is able to balance out the Parent and the Child Ego states is deficient in the intrapersonal and interpersonal relationships of these couples.

Keywords

اویدیوس نسو، پ. (1389). افسانه‌های دگردیسی. ترجمة میرجلال‌الدین کزازی. تهران: معین.
شکسپیر، و. (1344). آنتونی و کلئوپاترا. ترجمة علاءالدین پازارگادی. تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
الیوت، تی. اس. (1351). دشت سترون و اشعار دیگر. ترجمة پرویز لشکری. تهران: نیل.
الیوت، تی. اس. (1357). منظومة سرزمین بی‌حاصل. ترجمة حسن شهباز. تهران: بنگاه ترجمه و نشر کتاب.
 
Berne, E. (1966). Games people play. New York, NY: Grove.
Berne, E. (2001). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy: A systematic individual and social psychiatry. London, England: Souvenir.
Booth, A. (2015). Reading The Waste Land from the bottom-up. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cornell, W. F., de Graaf, A., Newton, T., & Thunnissen, M. (2016). Into TA: A comprehensive textbook on transactional analysis. London, England: Carnac Books Ltd.
Eliot, T. S. (2003). The waste land. In N. Baym (Ed.), Norton anthology of American literature (pp. 1973-2002). New York, NY: Norton & Company.
Eliot, T. S. (2006). The waste land. In L. Rainey (Ed.), The annotated Waste Land with Eliot's contemporary prose (pp. 57-126). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Harris, T. A. (2003). I'm ok - you're ok. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
Hirschfeld, H. (2003). What do women know?: “The roaring girl” and the wisdom of Tiresias. Renaissance Drama, 32, 123-146.
Kenner, H. (2007). The waste land. In H. Bloom (Ed.), T. S. Eliot's The Waste Land (pp. 7-34). New York, NY: Infobase.
Lupack, A., & Lupack, B. T. (1999). King Arthur in America. Cambridge, England: D. S. Brewer.
Palmer, M. (1966). Men and women in T.S. Eliot’s early poetry. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Publications.
Pondrom, C. N. (2005). T. S. Eliot: The performativity of gender in The Waste Land. Modernism/Modernity, 12(3), 425-441.
Rao, B. M. (2016). Themes, images, motifs, myths and symbols in T.S. Eliot's The Waste Land: A study. Research Insight, 2(4), 1-13.
Rhee, S. (2012). Post-war Europe: The Waste Land as a metaphor, (Unpublished thesis). Liberty University, Lynchburg, Virginia.
Stewart, I., & Joines, V. (2002). TA today: A new introduction to transactional analysis. Chapel Hill, NC: Lifespace.
Taylor, B., & Brewer, E. (1983). The return of King Arthur: British and American Arthurian literature since 1800. Cambridge, England: Barnes and Noble Books.
Wagner, R. (1865). Tristan and Isolde. Boston, MA: Oliver Ditson Company.
Weinberg, K. (1984). The women of Eliot and Baudelaire: The boredom, the horror and the glory. Modern Language Studies, 14(3), 31-42.
Wilson, R. J. (1973). Transactional analysis and literature, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska.
CAPTCHA Image