A Critical Evaluation of Vision 3: Rights Analysis and Culture in the Spotlight

Document Type : Research Article (Language and Culture)

Authors

• Hassan Soodmand Afshar
• Alireza Sohrabi

Department of English Language, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/lts.v53i4.86517

Abstract

This study critically evaluated the newly published Iranian twelfth-grade English textbook, Vision 3, with a focus on ‘rights analysis’ and ‘culture’ adopting a mixed-methods design. To this end, 200 Iranian school English teachers and 200 twelfth-grade students were selected nation-wide from various Iranian high schools based on convenience sampling. The participants (both male and female) completed a validated 56-item researcher-made questionnaire both online and in the paper format. Moreover, 15 teachers and 15 students, whose informed consent was obtained, attended a semi-structured interview voluntarily. The participants’ rights and needs as well as the cultural aspects of the book were also analyzed subjectively by the researchers. The results of the descriptive statistics of the questionnaire and the content analysis of the interviews showed that despite the authors’ claim that the book enjoyed a mainly communicative approach in its design and preparation, the Vision 3 package has serious shortcomings, including failure to take into account the students’ needs, the negligence of the rights of the teachers and students in the process of designing and compiling the book, following a producer-consumer attitude in developing the materials, ignoring the equal distribution of power, and pursuing an extreme localization and Iranianization of the target language culture. Therefore, it is recommended that policymakers consider both teachers and students’ viewpoints to overcome these drawbacks in future editions of the book.

Keywords

• Vision 3
• Rights Analysis
• Culture
• Localization
• School English Teachers and Students

20.1001.1.22285202.1399.53.4.4.0

References

احمدی صفا، م.، ذکرتی، س.، سیفی، ز.، غنچه پور، ا.، و ملک محمدی، ر. (1396). ارزیابی کلی پراسپکت دو از دیدگاه دبیران زبان انگلیسی، فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی زبان پژوهی دانشگاه الزهرا(س) ، 9(24)، 7-32.

درخشان، ع. (1397). تحلیل و نقد ارزش‌های فرهنگی در مجموعه کتاب‌های درسیAmerican English File ، پژوهشنامة انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، 18(8)، 53-76.

روحانی، ع.، و اکبرپور، س. (1393). نمود جنسیت در کتاب American English File، فصلنامه مطالعات و ترجمه (دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی)،47 (2)، 107-131.

سودمندافشار، ح. (1394). بررسی و نقد کتاب زبان انگلیسی پایه اول دورة اول متوسطه با تکیه بر جنبه‌های تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی: نمود جنسیت و قدرت. پژوهشنامة انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، 15(15)، 105-132.

سودمندافشار، ح.، یوسفی، م.، رنجبر، ن.، و افشار، ن. (1397). ارزیابی و نقد کتاب‌های درسی زبان انگلیسی پراسپکت و ویژن1 از منظر توانش ارتباطی بینافرهنگی و فرافرهنگی، فصلنامه مطالعات اندازه گیری و ارزشیابی، 8(21)، 107-139.

شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی. (1390). سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش. تهران: سازمان پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی.

شورای عالی آموزش و پرورش. (1391). برنامة درسی ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. تهران: سازمان پژوهش و برنامه ریزی آموزشی.

محمودی، م. ه.، و مرادی، م. (1394). نقد و ارزشیابی کیفی کتاب زبان پایه اول دورة اول متوسطه (هفتم) با تأکید بر روش‌شناسی آموزش زبان خارجی. پژوهشنامة انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، 15(3)، 179-196.

 

Ahmadi, A., & Derakhshan, A. (2015). An evaluation of the Iranian junior high school English textbooks "Prospect 1" and its old version "Right Path to English" from teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 4(1), 37-48.

Ahmadi, R., & Hasani, M. (2018). Capturing student voice on TEFL syllabus design: Agenticity of pedagogical dialogue negotiation. Cogent Education. 5(1), 1-17.

Alavi Moghaddam, S. B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, H. (2018). Vision 3: English for schools: Student book. Tehran, Iran: SAMT.

Alavi Moghaddam, S. B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, H. (2018). Vision 3: English for schools: Teacher's guide. Tehran, Iran: SAMT.

Alavi Moghaddam, S. B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, H. (2018). Vision3: English for schools: Work book. Tehran, Iran: SAMT.

Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Bemani, M., & Jahangard, A. (2014). Attitude analysis of teachers: The case of Iranian newly developed EFL textbook for junior high schools. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 7(1), 198-215.

Benesch, S. (1999). Rights analysis: Studying power relations in an academic setting. English for Specific Purposes, 18(4), 313-327.

Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics and practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Bovill, C., CookSather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as cocreators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). White Plains: Addison-Wesley Longman.

Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Byrd, D. R. (2007). Investigating how second language teachers are prepared to teach culture: An analysis of methods course syllabi (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa, Iowa.

Canagarajah, A. S. (1993). Critical ethnography of a Sri Lankan classroom: Ambiguities in student opposition to reproduction through ESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 601-626.

Cunningworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.

Ellis, R. (1985). Key issues in second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University press.

Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2010). Teacher's voice vs. students' voice: A needs analysis approach to English for Acadamic Purposes (EAP) in Iran. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 3-11.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.

Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Khany, R., & Tarlani-Aliabadi, H. (2016). Studying power relations in an academic setting: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of EAP classes in Iran. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21(1), 72-85.

Liddicoat, A. J. (2002). Static and dynamic views of culture and intercultural language acquisition. Babel, 36(3), 4-11.

McDonough, J., & Christopher, S. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher's guide. Hoboken, New Jersey: Blackwell Publishin.

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS program (6th ed.). London: McGraw-Hill Education.

Pennycook, A. (1994). Critical pedagogical approaches to research. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 690-693.

Pishghadam, R. (2011). Introducing applied ELT as a new approach in second/ foreign language studies. Iranian EFL Journal, 7(2), 8-14.

Riazi, A. M. (2003). What textbook evaluation schemes tell us? A study of the textbook evaluation schemes of three decades. In W. A. Renandya. (Ed.), Methodology and materials design in language teaching (pp. 52-68). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

Richards, J. C. (2001). The role of textbook in a language program. Retrieved from http:// www. Professorjackrichards .com/ wp - content/ uploads/ role – of –text books. pdf

Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246.

Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook selection and evaluation. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 432-453). Boston MA: Heinle & Heinle.

Soodmand Afshar, H., & Doosti, M. (2014). Exploring the characteristics of effective Iranian EFL teachers from students’ and teachers’ perspectives. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 6(1), 205-230.

Sunderland, J., Cowley, M., Abdul Rahim, F., Leontzakou, C., & Shattuck, J. (2000). From bias “in the text” to “teacher talk around the text”: An exploration of teacher discourse and gendered foreign language textbook texts. Linguistics and Education, 11(3), 251-286.

Tucker, C. A. (1975). Evaluating beginning textbooks. English Teaching Forum, 13(3), 355-361.

Widdowson, H. (2017). The cultural and creative use of English as a Lingua Franca. Lingue e Linguaggi, 21, 275-281.