Samuel Beckett and the Dawn of Object-Oriented Ontology in Act Without Words I

Document Type : Research Article

Author

• Shahriyar Mansouri

Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/lts.v54i2.88644

Abstract

Samuel Beckett’s efforts in dismantling anthropocentrism has ushered a new chapter not only in his oeuvre, which debunks the cliché binary of Man Vs nature, but in the postmodern look at ontology; his negative perspective introduces the man as a hollow body that neither seeks an aggressive independence nor includes a progressive cognitive dominance: the Beckettian man is nothing more than an empty shell. The characters in his plays, too, either lack a perception of the surrounding objects or surprisingly enough see themselves equal to such objects. Beckett’s dramatically negative perception of modern man can be explained as follows: first, the object has left its Heideggerian utilitarian cocoon, and thus cavorts as an object independent of man’s cognitive realm of confirmation; and second, the fall of man from his cognitive throne and into an abyss of stasis reaffirms the former hypothesis. Such a radical shift in his ontological attitude that can best be explained in light of the postmodern philosophy of object-oriented ontology hints at one alarming concept: a holistic ontological effort to reinvent the object as an equal existing entity to man. By debunking the Anthropos as the epicenter of existence, Beckett crafts new layers of being wherein the Hegelian-Nietzschean Übermensche or the creative Leibnizian Monads emerge as the notable absentees; the reality Beckett portrays is founded on the availability or lack thereof of an equal reciprocity between objects and the subject. By examining Beckett’s Act Without Words I and Graham Harman’s Object-Oriented Ontology, this essay explores and challenges the fruits of Beckett’s misanthropic reading of the modern man that lends itself to postmodern reversal of the traditional subject Vs. object binary opposition.

Keywords

• Object-Oriented Ontology
• The Invisible Realm
• Broken-Tool
• Man as the Sensual Object
• Ontic Presence

20.1001.1.22285202.1400.54.2.3.2

References

حدّاد، ا. (۱۳۸۹). حقیقت و معنا و آثار ساموئل بکت (با تأکید بر دیدگاه‌های آلن بادیو و تئودور آدورنو). نقد زبان و ادبیّات خارجی، ۳(۱)، ۴۹-۷۱.

عظیمی، ص.، و احمدزاده هروی، ش. (۱۳۹۷). به‌سوی تعریفی تازه از بدن: تحلیل مسأله بدن از فلسفه و جامعه‌شناسی تا ادبیّات. مطالعات زبان و ترجمه،  ۵۱(۴)،  ۸۵-۱۱۸.

 

Ackerley, C. J., & S. E. Gontarski. (2006). The faber companion to Samuel Beckett. London, England: Faber and Faber.

Badiou, A. (1995). Beckett: L’Increvable d ́esir. Paris, France: Hachette.

Barfield, S. (2002). Beckett and Heidegger: A critical survey. In R. Lane (Ed.). Beckett and philosophy (pp.154-166). New York, NY: Palgrave.

Beckett, S. (1931). Proust. London, England: Grove Press.

Beckett, S. (2009). Watt. London, England: Faber and Faber.

Beckett, S. (2012). The complete dramatic works. London, England: Faber and Faber.

Ben-Zvi, L. (2017). Memories of meeting Beckett. In A. Moorjani, D. de Ruyter-Tognotti, & S. Houppermans (Eds.). Beckett in conversation, “yet again” / Rencontres avec Beckett, “encore” (pp.63-69). Boston, USA: Brill Rodopi.

Cronin, A. (2009). Samuel Beckett: The last modernist. London, England: Flamingo Press.

Erickson, J. D. (1967). Objects and systems in the novels of Samuel Beckett. L'Esprit Créateur, 7(2), 113–122.

Esslin, M. (2014). Samuel Beckett and the art of radio. In S. E. Gontarski (Ed.). On Beckett: essays and criticism (pp. 979-1044). New York, NY: Anthem Press.

Federman, R. (2002). The imaginary museum of Samuel Beckett. Symploke, 10(1), 153-172.

Harman, G.(2002). Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Chicago, IL: Open Court.

Harman, G.(2018). Object-oriented ontology: A new theory of everything. London, England: Pelican Books.

Heidegger, M.(2010). Being and Time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). New York, NY: SUNY Press.

Johnson, J. (1988). Mixing humans and nonhumans together: The sociology of a door-closer. Social Problems, 35(3), 298-310.

Kennedy, A. (1997). Beckett and the modern/postmodern debate. Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd'hui, 6(1), 255–266.

Kenner, H. (1968). Samuel Beckett: A critical study. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Kern, E. (1962). Beckett’s knight of infinite resignation. Yale French Studies, 29(1), 49-56.

Knowlson, J. (1996). Damned to fame: The life of Samuel Beckett. London, England: Bloomsbury.

Krysinski, W., & R. Mikkanen (1981). Semiotic modalities of the body in modern theater. Poetics Today, 2(3), 141-161.

Lamont, R. C. (1987). To speak the words of ‘the tribe’: The wordlessness of Samuel Beckett’s metaphysical clowns. In K. H. Burkman (Ed.). Myth and ritual in the plays of Samuel Beckett (pp. 56-72). London, England: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.

Latour, B. (2009). Will the nonhumans be saved? An argument in ecotheology. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 15(3), 459-475.

Ponge, F. (1949). Braque, or modern art as event and pleasure (S. Beckett, Trans.). Transition Forty-Nine, 5, 43–47.

Sage, V. (1977). Dickens and Beckett: Two uses of materialism. Journal of Beckett Studies, 2, 15–39.

Sartre, J. P. (1980). Existentialism and humanism (P. Mairet, Trans.). London, England: Methuen.

Schwalm, H.  (1997). Beckett’s trilogy and the limits of self-deconstruction. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd'hui, 6, 181-192.

Thurling Quinn, M. L. (1975). Objects in the theatre of Samuel Beckett: Their function and significance as components of his theatrical language, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), McMaster University, Canada.

Weller, S. (2020). Negative anthropology: Beckett and humanism. Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’Hui, 32, 161-175.

Wellwarth, G. E. (1961). Life in the void: Samuel Beckett. The University of Kansas Review, 23(1), 25-33.