A Text-driven Approach to Developing Localized English Language Teaching Materials

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Sedigheh Vahdat ¹
• Mohammad Reza Anani Sarab ²
• Sadegh Ghobadi ³

¹ Department of English Language and Literature. Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

² Department of English Language and Literature, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

³ Department of English Language and Literature, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/lts.2023.83553.1206

Abstract

The global spread of English resulted in a surge in the global demand for learning this lingua franca. The majority of English language teaching is conducted through global ELT coursebooks. However, the end users have continuously criticized the promotion of Western values, consolidation of linguistic imperialism, and hegemonic practices through these books. This study describes the process of developing localized English language teaching materials based on research findings and Tomlinson’s text-driven approach. The selection of suitable texts is essential for optimizing language learning through SLA principles, such as providing learners with ample opportunities for meaningful language use and directing their attention toward meaning. After development, these materials, along with their accompanying audio and video files, were uploaded to an online platform (www.chamranelt.ir) where language teachers could employ them in their classrooms. This is the most prominent characteristic of the platform, and it is argued that it can be a solution to the possible cultural problems caused by global English language teaching coursebooks. These materials are more learner-centered, more engaging, and can provide learners with numerous opportunities to develop their intercultural communicative competence. Due to their cost-effectiveness, they can be efficiently marketed.

Keywords

• Materials Development
• Linguistic Imperialism
• Hegemonic Practices
• Intercultural Communicative Competence
• Text-driven Approach

Main Subjects

• Language Education

References

احمدی‌صفا، م.، و فراهانی، م. (1394). پرورش توانش بینا‌‌فرهنگی کتاب در پراسپکت یک بر اساس دیدگاه معلمان زبان ‌‌انگلیسی به منزلة زبان خارجی. پژوهش‌نامه انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی، 15(36)، 1-21.

بحرینی، ن. (1392). تحلیل ارزش‌های فرهنگی در کتاب‌های آموزش زبان انگلیسی. راهبرد فرهنگ، 6(22)، 163-182.

خسروی، ر.، و رفیعی، آ. (1396). درآمدی بر آسیب شناسی تدریس فرهنگ در ایران: بررسی رابطۀ بین فرهنگ زدایی و هوش هیجانی در بین زبان آموزان انگلیسی. پژوهش‌های زبانشناختی در زبان‌های خارجی، 7(1)، 98-79.https://doi.org/10.22059/jflr.2017.234816.342

رضائیان، م.، قهاری، ش.، و دهمرده، م. (1396). تبعات اجتماعی‌فرهنگی آموزش زبان انگلیسی: آسیب‌شناسی و ارائۀ مدل چهار وجهی. مطالعات زبان و ترجمه، 50(4)، 169-192.https://doi.org/10.22067/lts.v50i4.53349

طاهرخانی، ر.، و متقی، ف. (1400). ارزیابی و نقد کتاب درسی زبان انگلیسی پایۀ هشتم، Prospect 2 (پراسپکت 2)، از لحاظ جنبه‌های فرهنگی. پژوهش‌نامه انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی، 21(10)، 295-321. https://doi.org/10.30465/crtls.2021.25761.1561

علی پور، م. ر.، و عباسی، ع. (1401). تهدید‌ها و فرصت‌های بین‌المللی‌شدن و بومی‌سازی برنامه‌های درسی در نظام آموزشی ایران در دو دهۀ اخیر و ارائۀ راهکار‌های پیشنهادی. نوآوری های آموزشی، 21(1)،47-70.  https://doi.org/10.22034/JEI.2021.228508.1465

کوشا، م.، طالبی نژاد، م. ر.، و تاکی، س. (1384). تجزیه و تحلیل انتقادی گفتمان کتب رایج آموزش زبان انگلیسی بین المللی و داخلی در ایران. مجله زبانشناسی کاربردی، 7(2)، 45-78.

 

Ahour, T., & Zaferani, P. (2016). A critical visual analysis of gender representation of ELT materials from a multimodal perspective. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(18), 78-98.

Al-Busaidi, S., & Tindle K. (2010). Evaluating the impact of in-house materials on language learning. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 137-149). Bloomsbury.

Al-Issa, A. (2021). Using English language teaching professionalism to bash cultural imperialism in the Sultanate of Oman: A response to Wyatt and Sargeant. Studies in Culture and Education, 28(3), 341-352. https:// doi.org/ 10.1080/ 1358684X. 2021.1904381

Asgari, A. (2011). Compatibility of cultural value in Iranian EFL textbooks. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(4), 887-894. http:// dx.doi.org/ 10.4304/ jltr.2.4.887-894

Benjamin, R. (2012). Reconstructing readability: Recent developments and recommendations in the analysis of text difficulty. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 63-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9181-8

Bowen, P., & Delaney, D. (2010). Got it. Oxford University Press.

British Council (2015). The English effect.  Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office. https://britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/english-effect-report-v2.pdf

Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.

Byram, M., & Zarate, G. (1994). Definitions, objectives and assessment of sociocultural objectives. Council of Europe.

Canagarajah, S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.

Cha, K. A. (1995). The effect of text length in the diagnosis of reading comprehension. Journal of the Applied Linguistics Association of Korea, 8(1), 249-275. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n3p329

Cheong Cheng, Y. (2000). A CMI‐triplization paradigm for reforming education in the new millennium. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(4), 156-174. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540010371975

Cook, G. (1997). Schemas. ELT Journal, 51(1), 86-86. https:// doi.org/ 10.1093/ elt/51.1.86

Copley, K. (2018). Neoliberalism and ELT coursebook content. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 15(1), 43–62. http:// dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/ 15427587. 2017. 1318664

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.

Darici, A., & Tomlinson, B. (2016). A case study of principled materials in action. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.). SLA research and materials development for language learning (pp. 71-86). Routledge.

Falla, T., & Davis, P. A. (2012). Solutions (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Ghaffari, M., Kuhi, D., & Aslrasuli, M. (2023). Critical cultural awareness in Iranian ELT coursebooks: Coursebook realizations and ideals. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 11(44), 53-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.30495/jfl.2023.699905

Gray, J. (2010). The construction of English: Culture, consumerism, and promotion in the ELT coursebook. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hassannejad, E., Ghaemi, F., & Pourdana N. (2020). Designing culture-oriented materials for Iranian EAP students: The relative impacts of receptive and productive task performance. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 72-90. http://dx.doi.org/20.1001.1.24763187.2020.9.2.6.5

Hutchinson, D. (2014). Project (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Javdani, F., Mahboudi, H.R., & Ghafoori, N. (2009). The attitudes of Iranian EFL learners toward cross-cultural factors in language learning. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 99-122.

Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (Ed.), English in the world: Teaching the language and the literature (pp. 11-30). Cambridge University Press.

Karimi, F., & Nafissi, Z. (2017). Effects of different culturally-based materials on EFL learners’ reading anxiety, reading self-efficacy, and reading proficiency in project-based classes. Issues in Language Teaching, 6(1), 83-115. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2017.8420

Kiczkowiak, M. (2020). Seven principles for writing materials for English as a lingua franca. ELT Journal, 74(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz042

Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford University Press.

Kroger, J. (2017). Identity development in adolescence and adulthood. In Oxford research encyclopedias of psychology (online). Oxford University Press.

Lee, K. S. (1999). The effects of the number of questions per passage, the length of passage, and topic familiarity on multiple-choice English listening and reading comprehension tests. English Teaching, 54(4), 327-35110.25256/PAAL.24.2.6

Littlejohn, A., & Hicks, D. (1997). Cambridge English for schools. Cambridge University Press.

Lopriore, L. & Tsantila, N. (2022). Adapting ELT coursebooks listening materials within an ELF-aware perspective: Voices from Greek and Italian classrooms. Boğaziçi University Education Journal, 39, 279-302. https://doi.org10.52597/ buje. 1227226

Mackenzie, L. (2021) Linguistic imperialism, English, and development: implications for Colombia. Current Issues in Language Planning, 23(2), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.1939977

Monfared, A., & Khatib, M. (2018). English or Englishes? Outer and Expanding circle teachers’ awareness of and attitudes towards their own variants of English in ESL/EFL teaching contexts. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n2.4

Morady Moghaddam, M.  & Tirnaz, M.H. (2023). Representation of intercultural communicative competence in ELT textbooks: Global vs. local values. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 52(2), 191-215. 

Mozaffarzadeh, S., & Ajideh P. (2019). Intercultural competence: A neglected essential in the Iranian ELT textbooks. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 7(2), 167-183.

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.

Phillipson, R. (2012). Imperialism and colonialism. In B. Spolsky (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of language policy (pp. 203–235). Cambridge University Press.

Riazi, A. M. (2003). What do textbook evaluation schemes tell us? A study of the textbook evaluation schemes of three decades. In W. Renandya (Ed.), Methodology and materials design in language teaching (pp. 52-68). SEMEO Regional Center.

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Simpson, W. (2017). An instrumental tool held at arm’s length: English as a vehicle of cultural imperialism in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 333-348.

Tomlinson, B. (1999). Materials development for language teachers. Modern English Teacher, 8(1), 62-64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528

Tomlinson, B. (2000). Beginning to read forever. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 523-538.

Tomlinson, B. (2013). Developing materials for language teaching. Bloomsbury.

Tomlinson, B. (2020). Is materials development progressing? Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 15, 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2020.15.01

Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2004). Developing language course materials. RELC Portfolio Series.

Tomlinson, B., & Whittaker, C. (2010). (Eds.). Case studies of blended learning courses. British Council.

Ulla, M. B., Perales, W.F. (2021). Developing an English language teaching textbook in a Thai university: Classroom language teachers as writers. English Teaching & Learning, 45,461-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-021-00078-2

Vahdat, S., Anai Sarab, M., Ghobadi, S. (2020). Evaluating the cultura appropriacy of commercial English language teaching textbooks in the Iranian context. Teaching English Language, 14(2), 111-144. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel. [phone]

Van Loi, N. (2022). Engaging EFL learners in reading: A text-driven approach to improve reading performance. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 26(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26102a5

Yi, Y. S. (2013). On the optimal text length of reading comprehension texts. The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature, 55(4), 505-530. http://doi.org/10.18853/jjell.2013.55.4.023

Zyzik, E. C., & Polio, C. (2017). Authentic materials myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. University of Michigan Press.