A Comparative Study of Modalities in Iranian and Malaysian High School English Textbooks

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Saeed Ketabi
• Mina Karimi

Department of English, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/lts.v51i4.77905

Abstract

A speaker’s view towards a specific matter such as ‘doubt’, ’obligation’, etc., is expressed through different ways; one of these ways is through using modal auxiliary verbs as well as their verb phrase structures. This study is to compare the presentation of nine central modal auxiliaries and their related verb phrase structures in pedagogical English textbooks of Iran and Malaysia. For this purpose, all three grades of lower secondary level English textbooks in Iran and Malaysia were used. Also, the British National Corpus was used in order to compare the use of such verbs in English textbooks with their use in the Standard English. The results indicated that there were similarities in the frequency distribution of these verbs between pedagogical textbooks of Iran and Malaysia. But, such verbs are generally more frequent in Malaysian textbooks in comparison with the Iranian ones. In addition, there were some differences regarding their frequency distribution between the textbooks and the Standard English in BNC. The results could have some implications for effective material development in future.

Keywords

• Comparative Study
• Modal Auxiliary Verbs
• Language Pedagogy
• Iran
• Malaysia
• Junior Secondary School

20.1001.1.22285202.1397.51.4.2.4

References

حسینی‌خواه، ع.، مهرمحمدی، م.، فردانش، ه.، و اسدی، ر. (1392). مطالعۀ تطبیقی برنامۀ درسی آموزش زبان انگلیسی در ایران و سوئد با تأکید بر دورۀ متوسطه. مطالعات برنامه درسی ایران، ۸(۳۱)، 7-46

طالبی، ز.، اسدی، ن.، و دواتگری، ه. (1397). بررسی مقایسه‌ای تأثیر روش‌های تدریس مبتنی بر رویکرد نتیجه‌گرا فرایندگرا و فن بیان در مهارت نگارشی فراگیران زبان انگلیسی سطح متوسط. جستارهای زبانی، ۹(۳)، 159-178

فسنقری، ح.، و عادل، م. (1397). بررسی مقایسه‌ای آسیب‌شناسی یادگیری و آموزش زبان انگلیسی و عربی در ایران از دیدگاه دبیران آموزش و پرورش: یک تحقیق داده بنیاد. جستارهای زبانی، ۹(۲)، 181-207.

مهرمحمدی، م. (1372). بررسی تطبیقی نظام برنامه‌ریزی درسی در جمهوری اسلامی ایران و جمهوری فدرال آلمان. تعلیم و تربیت، (۳۵و۳۶)، 95-122

 

Back, J., & Lee, E. (2017). Perception and Production of English Modal Verbs by Korean University Students in Written Academic Discourse. The Journal of linguistic Science, 81, 133-160.

Fazilatfar, A. M., & Sedghi, M. (2017). Exploring the acquisition of English modal auxiliary verbs by Persian EFL learners considering full transfer/full access theory. Foreign Language Research Journal.

Figueroa, C., & Garate, T. (2005). Studies in contrastive linguistics. Santiago: University of Santiago publications.

Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315-328.

Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3), 239–56.

Jabbari, A. A, & Sedghi, M. (2015). Acquisition of English modality by Persian EFL learners. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(5), 23-45.

Kader, M., Begi, N., & Vaseghi, R. (2013). A corpus based study of Malaysian ESL learners use of modals in argumentative compositions. English Language Teaching, 6(9), 146-157.

Khojasteh, L., & Kafipour, R. (2012). Are modal auxiliaries in Malaysian English in line with their usage in real language? English language Teaching, 2(2), 68-77.

Khojasteh, L., & Kafipour, R. (2012). Have the modal verb phrase structures been well presented in Malaysian English language textbooks? English Language and Literature Studies, 2(1), 35-41.

Khojasteh, L., & Mukundan, J. (2011). Modal auxiliary verbs in prescribed Malaysian English textbooks. English language teaching, 4(1), 79-89.

Khojasteh, L., & Reinders, H. (2013). How textbooks and learners get it wrong, A corpus study of modal auxiliary verbs. Applied Linguistics Research on English Languages, 2(1).

Khojasteh, L., & Shokrpour, N. (2015). The "permission"/"possibility"/"ability" modals in Malaysian English textbooks: A corpus-based analysis. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 18(2), 56-69.

Khojasteh, L., Shokrpour, N., & Torabiardakan, N. (2017). EFL advanced adult learners; use of English modals in narrative compositions. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci and Hum 25(4), 1803-1820.

Manaf, U. (2007). The use of modals in Malaysian ESL learners’ writing. (Unpublished doctoral dissertaion). Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.

McEnery, T., & Kifle, N. A. (2002). Epistemic modality in argumentative essays of second-language writers. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 182-195). Harlow: Longman.

Qun, Z. (2010). Modality and Generic Features in Chinese EFL Writings. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 40-51.

Shayon, L. (2013). Modal sequences in Chinese senior school students’ English compositions. Paper presented at the 2nd international conference on science and social research.

Torabiardakani, N., Khojasteh, L., & Shokrpour, N. (2015). Modal auxiliary verbs and their semantic functions used by advanced EFL learners. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 8(2), 51-63.

Vethamani, M. E., Manaf, U. K. A., & Akbari, O. (2008). ESL learners’ use of English modals in narrative compositions: Syntactic and semantic accuracy. TEFLIN Journal, 19(2), 141-159.

Vethamani, M. E., Manaf, U. K. A., & Akbari, O. (2008). Students’ use of modals in narrative compositions: forms and functions. English Language Teaching, 1(1), 61-74.

Yang, X. (2018). A Corpus-based Study of Modal Verbs in Chinese Learners’ Academic Writing. English Language Teaching, 11(2), 122-130.